Some people think that doctors, engineers, and other
professionals
should stay and Use synonyms
work
in the country where they Use synonyms
trained
. They argue that public money often pays for tuition, so graduates should give back to their own society. Others believe these Add a missing verb
are trained
professionals
should be free to Use synonyms
work
in any country they choose. Use synonyms
This
essay will look at both sides and explain why I feel it is better to encourage, rather than force, Linking Words
professionals
to stay.
On one hand, requiring graduates to Use synonyms
work
at home helps fill critical gaps in services. Use synonyms
For example
, if a medical student’s university fees are paid by the state, it seems fair they spend several years treating patients in local hospitals. A newly qualified doctor who joins a rural clinic immediately can save lives and ease staff shortages. Mandatory service schemes can make sure that remote areas Linking Words
also
get good care.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, allowing Linking Words
professionals
to choose their workplace can boost skills and motivation. Use synonyms
For instance
, an engineer who moves abroad to learn the latest technology in renewable energy may return home with new ideas that improve local power grids. Working in different countries can expose Linking Words
professionals
to better equipment, higher standards, and fresh perspectives. When they do come back, they often share knowledge that benefits their original country.
ı
In my view, compulsory Use synonyms
work
schemes are too rigid and may push some people to leave permanently. Use synonyms
Instead
, governments should offer attractive incentives—Linking Words
such
as loan forgiveness, higher starting salaries, or fast‑track promotions—to encourage Linking Words
professionals
to stay. Use synonyms
This
positive approach can retain talent Linking Words
while
still respecting individual freedom.Linking Words
i.nureddinn