Certain countries protect their native industries by imposing heavy tariffs on imported goods. Other countries encourage imports in order to ensure their citizens access to as many goods as possible. Should countries be allowed to impose high tariffs on imports or should all countries allow each other free access to their markets? What do you think? Give reasons and examples to support your opinion.

In an increasingly globalised economy, the issue of

trade

Use synonyms

barriers remains a point of contention.

While

Linking Words

some nations impose high

tariffs

Use synonyms

to safeguard domestic

industries

Use synonyms

, others advocate for open markets to maximise consumer choice and competitiveness. In my view,

while

Linking Words

strategic protectionism may be justified in certain circumstances, a long-term commitment to free

trade

Use synonyms

yields greater benefits both economically and socially. Proponents of high

tariffs

Use synonyms

often argue that they are essential to protect fledgling

industries

Use synonyms

and prevent job losses in vulnerable sectors.

For instance

Linking Words

, a developing country may impose

tariffs

Use synonyms

on foreign agricultural products to shield its farmers from being undercut by heavily subsidised imports.

This

Linking Words

temporary protection can allow local

industries

Use synonyms

to build capacity, improve infrastructure, and eventually become competitive on a global scale.

Moreover

Linking Words

,

tariffs

Use synonyms

may serve as a tool to preserve national sovereignty and economic independence, particularly in sectors deemed critical for security or public welfare.

However

Linking Words

,

such

Linking Words

protectionist policies, if prolonged or misused, can lead to inefficiency, complacency, and a lack of innovation. When domestic

industries

Use synonyms

are shielded from international competition, there is little incentive to improve product quality, reduce prices, or invest in research and development.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, consumers ultimately bear the cost of

tariffs

Use synonyms

through higher prices and limited choices.

For example

Linking Words

, in the case of the U.S.–China

trade

Use synonyms

war, many American businesses and households suffered from increased costs

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

everyday goods, which arguably outweighed any short-term gains for domestic manufacturers.

Conversely

Linking Words

, economies that embrace free

trade

Use synonyms

often enjoy a wider variety of goods, better quality, and lower prices. Free market access encourages healthy competition, which drives innovation and economic growth. Take the European Union,

for instance

Linking Words

: by eliminating internal

tariffs

Use synonyms

, member countries have created a vast single market that has strengthened

industries

Use synonyms

and improved living standards.

Additionally

Linking Words

, open

trade

Use synonyms

fosters international cooperation and interdependence, reducing the likelihood of conflict and promoting global stability. In conclusion,

while

Linking Words

there are valid arguments for imposing

tariffs

Use synonyms

in specific cases—

such

Linking Words

as nurturing infant

industries

Use synonyms

or protecting strategic sectors—free access to markets is generally the more sustainable and equitable approach. Rather than resorting to blanket protectionism, countries should aim for balanced

trade

Use synonyms

policies that support domestic growth

while

Linking Words

embracing the benefits of global commerce.