Countries provide a large amount of help to creators; others say that it is a misuse of
money
that could have been used Use synonyms
elsewhere
. Linking Words
While
artisans need significant assistance at the beginning of their careers, I believe that spending Linking Words
money
on health is far more important.
On the one hand, painters should be supported by their government because it is very difficult for them to start from scratch. Without sufficient financial assistance at their beginnings, many are likely to give up early. Use synonyms
As a result
, states ought to pay more attention to them, as they face numerous challenges in pursuing their artistic paths. Linking Words
For example
, Rahaj Khan, a renowned Indian artist, stated that he struggled at the start of his career Linking Words
due to
the lack of support in his home country, and he even considered quitting painting several times. Linking Words
Therefore
, he established PZO, a free foundation aimed at helping emerging artists. Linking Words
However
, I believe that spending Linking Words
money
on healthcare should be prioritised.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, there are those who believe that governments squander their Linking Words
money
when they give it to artists. They think that there are so many other departments, Use synonyms
such
as education, infrastructure and health, that need attention and are underfunded. Linking Words
For example
, in every country in the world, there are still incurable diseases, Linking Words
such
as diabetes, and the whole country would benefit if there were more attention given to finding a cure. I believe health is much more worthy of state spending because it saves lives, Linking Words
whereas
art is quite useless in Linking Words
this
regard.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
supporting creatives of all kinds of arts is going to produce a lot of masterpieces, it can't cure the ill or increase people’s biological age, and Linking Words
that is
why healthcare is far more important.Linking Words