Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Information about lawmakers' personal lives should not be shared in public.
This
Linking Words
essay completely agrees with
this
Linking Words
statement because the
privacy
Use synonyms
of politicians must be respected, and sharing personal details can
also
Linking Words
harm their loved ones. Confidential information is always a valued thing in every culture. Everyone in
this
Linking Words
life deserves some
privacy
Use synonyms
in their own life, no matter how important they are in society, because
this
Linking Words
is a human right.
Moreover
Linking Words
, if the politician's
privacy
Use synonyms
is invaded by the public, it may lead him to retire once and for all.
For example
Linking Words
, Harvard University has recently reported that 72% of legislators have stated that the worst thing about their occupations is the lack of
privacy
Use synonyms
. Another reason why sharing elected officials' lives should be banned is the fact that their loved ones may face dangerous situations. Everybody wants their family and the people they appreciate to be protected, and that includes politicians as well. Being a person with a high position in the country,
such
Linking Words
as an officeholder, may put their families as target individuals for groups that are extremist from the state system.
For instance
Linking Words
, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her family received death threats from far-right groups during the 2015 refugee crisis, forcing authorities to increase their protection and ban them from some public activities for fear of being targeted. In conclusion, violating lawmakers’
privacy
Use synonyms
rights poses serious risks,
such
Linking Words
as endangering the safety of their families.
Therefore
Linking Words
, I firmly believe that publishing details about their personal lives is unjustified.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task response
State your main view in the first line and follow it with a plan so all ideas stay on one path.
Task response
Explain each idea with a reason and end with a small example that fits well.
Coherence
Use linking words to show how each idea fits with the last one and make the flow smooth.
Coherence
Have a short intro that says what you will talk about and a short conclusion that ends the view.
Examples
Check the facts you use. If you name numbers or facts, make sure they are true.
Language
Use simple and clear language. Avoid odd or strange phrase.
Strength
Clear view on the topic and a plan in the essay.
Strength
Good use of connectors and clear end.
Strength
The essay follows a real essay plan with intro, body, and conclusion.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: