Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that has scientifically been proved to have bad effects on people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree

In recent years, concerns about
food
Use synonyms
safety have prompted some governments to remove certain
products
Use synonyms
from local markets.
While
Linking Words
some people argue that banning scientifically proven unhealthy
foods
Use synonyms
would improve public well-being, others believe
this
Linking Words
policy would negatively affect lower-income groups. In my opinion, a complete prohibition is unrealistic and carries more disadvantages than benefits. On the one hand, banning
foods
Use synonyms
with little or no nutritional value could enhance public health.
For instance
Linking Words
,
products
Use synonyms
high in sugar, oil, and saturated fats are strongly linked to conditions
such
Linking Words
as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Overconsumption of
such
Linking Words
items places a heavy burden on healthcare systems. If governments restricted or eliminated these
foods
Use synonyms
, fewer citizens would suffer from preventable illnesses, ultimately reducing healthcare costs and improving the
overall
Linking Words
quality of life in society.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, restricting these
products
Use synonyms
would disproportionately harm people from lower economic backgrounds. Processed and low-nutrient
foods
Use synonyms
are often significantly cheaper than healthier alternatives, making them more accessible to poorer families.
By contrast
Linking Words
, nutrient-rich
foods
Use synonyms
such
Linking Words
as fresh fruits, vegetables, and lean proteins are considerably more expensive.
This
Linking Words
cost difference would deepen social inequality if unhealthy
food
Use synonyms
options were suddenly removed.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, strict bans could encourage the growth of black markets, where
food
Use synonyms
safety is unregulated and
products
Use synonyms
may expose consumers to even greater risks. In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
removing harmful
food
Use synonyms
products
Use synonyms
from the market could promote public health, it would likely create financial strain for vulnerable populations and stimulate illegal
food
Use synonyms
trade. A more balanced approach would involve limited regulation combined with widespread education on nutrition, ensuring that citizens are both informed and able to make healthier dietary choices.
This
Linking Words
solution is both fair and practical for modern societies.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
State a clear opinion in the first sentence and keep it clear across the essay.
coherence
Build each paragraph around one main idea with a clear topic sentence.
task response
Use more specific examples to show how policies would affect people.
coherence
Vary linking words to show connection but avoid too many similar phrases.
accuracy
Check grammar and spelling for accuracy.
task response
Clear stance on the issue.
coherence
Good essay structure with intro, body, and conclusion.
coherence
Ideas follow a logical order and are easy to track.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • health
  • food
  • drink
  • harm
  • science
  • prove
  • ban
  • rule
  • law
  • shop
  • sell
  • people
  • child
  • adult
  • choice
  • freedom
  • cost
  • benefit
  • risk
  • tax
  • label
  • warning
  • market
  • policy
  • work
  • plan
  • time
  • money
  • fair
  • clear
  • easy
  • difficult
  • strong
  • weak
  • plan
  • idea
  • enforce
  • educate
  • option
  • healthy
  • unhealthy
  • advertising
  • school
  • mother
  • father
  • family
  • society
  • government
What to do next:
Look at other essays: