Public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free for people who use it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that governments ought to allocate public funds to make public
transport
Use synonyms
free at the point of use. I partly agree.
While
Linking Words
a zero-fare policy can deliver clear environmental and economic gains, a universal scheme is fiscally heavy and not always the most efficient way to improve mobility.
To begin
Linking Words
with, removing or significantly reducing
fares
Use synonyms
would encourage a modal shift from private cars to buses and trains.
As a result
Linking Words
, road congestion would ease and tailpipe emissions would fall, which in turn improves urban air quality and public health.
In addition
Linking Words
, fare-free access can expand mobility for students, the elderly, and low-income households who might
otherwise
Linking Words
be priced out of reliable
transport
Use synonyms
. Beyond the environment, free public
transport
Use synonyms
may
also
Linking Words
yield economic benefits.
For example
Linking Words
, households would retain more disposable income, and employers could see better punctuality when buses and trains are frequent and uncrowded.
Moreover
Linking Words
, wider access to jobs across a city strengthens labour-market participation.
However
Linking Words
, making every journey free is not a costless solution. Operating subsidies would rise sharply and might crowd out investment in frequency, maintenance, and network coverage—the very features that persuade people to ride. What is more, universal free travel grants the same subsidy to high-income commuters who
could
Wrong verb form
can
show examples
reasonably pay, which is arguably regressive. Without parallel investment in capacity, zero
fares
Use synonyms
can
also
Linking Words
trigger overcrowding and declining service quality.
Therefore
Linking Words
, a more defensible compromise is targeted support: keep
fares
Use synonyms
low
overall
Linking Words
, make travel free or heavily discounted for priority groups, and introduce off-peak concessions to spread demand. Crucially, governments should prioritise service quality—frequency, reliability, and cleanliness—because these factors, ultimately, determine sustained ridership more than price alone. In conclusion, I agree to an extent: governments should subsidise public
transport
Use synonyms
, but smart, targeted funding is preferable to blanket free
fares
Use synonyms
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

overall
The essay shows a good answer with a clear view and it covers both sides. To raise the score, add more exact ideas and some numbers or real details to back each point.
task response
Task response is solid. Improve it by making the final view stronger and by giving more clear steps on policy choice.
coherence
Coherence and flow are good. Keep this by using clear sign words and by making each part link well to the next.
coherence
Some ideas stay general. Use more precise examples or cases for each point to show depth.
coherence
Try shorter sentences sometimes. Long sentence can hide a joined idea. Use one idea per sentence more.
strength
Clear view that is balanced.
strength
Good use of linking words to show flow.
strength
Strong paragraph structure with a clear order.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • subsidize
  • sustainability
  • commuters
  • congestion
  • infrastructure
  • accommodate
  • equitable access
  • public transportation system
  • allocating resources
  • financial burden
What to do next:
Look at other essays: