Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about these crops on our health and the environment. Interfering with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The rapid development of biotechnology has enabled scientists to create genetically modified (
GM
Use synonyms
)
crops
Use synonyms
that promise higher yields, pest resistance, and even nutritional enhancements. Despite these potential advantages, critics argue that
such
Linking Words
crops
Use synonyms
may pose unknown
risks
Use synonyms
to human health and the environment, and
therefore
Linking Words
should be banned altogether.
While
Linking Words
I acknowledge the legitimate concerns, I strongly disagree that
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
should be prohibited, as their benefits outweigh the uncertainties when accompanied by strict regulation. On the one hand, there are undeniable
risks
Use synonyms
in altering natural genetic structures. Since
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
are relatively new, their long-term effects on human health remain uncertain.
For instance
Linking Words
, some studies suggest that allergic reactions or unforeseen genetic mutations could occur in consumers.
Additionally
Linking Words
, the widespread use of
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
could threaten biodiversity. If a modified crop cross-pollinates with wild plants, it may create so-called “superweeds” that are resistant to herbicides, ultimately disrupting natural ecosystems. These
risks
Use synonyms
justify the call for caution and highlight the importance of ethical responsibility among biotechnology firms.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, banning
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
altogether would ignore the significant benefits they can bring, particularly in addressing global food insecurity. Many developing countries face challenges
such
Linking Words
as drought, poor soil fertility, and crop diseases. Genetically modified varieties can be engineered to withstand harsh climates, reduce dependence on pesticides, and improve nutrition —
for example
Linking Words
, “Golden Rice,” enriched with Vitamin A, has the potential to combat malnutrition in Asia and Africa.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, history shows that innovation often carries initial uncertainty. Penicillin,
for example
Linking Words
, was once met with
skepticism
Change the spelling
scepticism
show examples
, yet it became a revolutionary medical breakthrough.
Similarly
Linking Words
, careful research and controlled trials of
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
can unlock immense benefits for humanity. In my view, the solution lies not in prohibition, but in regulation. Governments and international
organizations
Change the spelling
organisations
show examples
should implement rigorous testing, long-term monitoring, and transparent labelling to ensure that
risks
Use synonyms
are
minimized
Change the spelling
minimised
show examples
and consumers are informed. By combining innovation with precaution, society can enjoy the advantages of
GM
Use synonyms
technology
while
Linking Words
safeguarding health and the environment. In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
genetically modified
crops
Use synonyms
may carry certain
risks
Use synonyms
, prohibiting them would be shortsighted. With proper oversight, they represent a powerful tool in combating hunger, improving nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture.
Therefore
Linking Words
, rather than banning
GM
Use synonyms
crops
Use synonyms
, the world should focus on responsible development and strict regulation.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your view is clear and you give why you disagree. You use a good idea and some examples. To be stronger, add more facts or data from real studies.
coherence
Your writing flows well. Use a few more linking words to show how ideas go together.
coherence
Try to give more on how rules or tests would work. Also show limits of each point.
language
Check grammar and shorten long sentences to make ideas clearer.
content
Clear view and stance.
content
Good use of examples (Golden Rice).
structure
Good structure with intro, body, and conclusion.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: