It is more important for the government to spend money on promoting the healthy lifestyle to prevent illness rather than on the treatment of people who are really ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether the government should subsidize
money
in healthcare to prevent illness or allocate funds to the treatment
of patients has become an intense debate these days. I firmly believe that the former option is more beneficial than the latter and will outline my arguments for this
opinion in this
essay.
On the one hand, treatment
plays a vital role in our society. It is obvious that some diseases are inevitable, especially those that are common in the old. For example
, diabetes is a chronic condition that affects many elderly people, regardless of their lifestyles or habits. In addition
, government support is critical when the treatment
costs exceed the patients’ financial capacity. Many people in developing countries, for instance
, cannot afford the expensive and prolonged treatment
for cancer, which has become a major concern of working families. In these cases, providing a cure is the sole way to ensure people’s health and civil rights.
Nevertheless
, there is a wide range of evidence proving that prevention is always better than cure. By adopting a healthy lifestyle, the masses are less likely to develop illness. The fewer patients there are, the less money
will be invested in treatment
facilities, medicines and healthcare staff. This
is substantially profitable for saving money
since that amount can be allotted in other domains such
as military, and education. Moreover
, being ill may lead to a few detrimental consequences. For instance
, if a worker gets ill, not only their productivity is reduced, but also
their health is compromised. Once the productivity and well-being of citizens drop, it will have an adverse impact on the economy as well as
on society as a whole.
To recapitulate, while
both approaches are essential, I am of the opinion that the government should spend more resources towards stimulating citizens to adopt a healthy lifestyle. However
, the authorities should also
take everything into serious consideration to distribute money
precisely on each side. By doing this
, people will stay healthy and the economy as well as
society will sustainably grow.Submitted by weezel on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which is commendable. However, the coherence could be further enhanced by linking ideas more explicitly and ensuring paragraphs flow more naturally from one to the next with better use of cohesive devices.
task achievement
You addressed the task and presented a clear position throughout the essay. Your arguments would benefit from a more balanced discussion of both prevention and treatment, including more specific examples to support your claims. This would contribute to a more complete response to the prompt.