Some people argue that there should be longer weekends and shorter working weeks. I totally disagree with
this
statement. I believe that the proposed time repartition between worktime and days off could demoralise workers Linking Words
as well as
reduce their productivity and impact negatively in the Linking Words
overall
economic situation in the world.
Workers need motivation and purpose to continue their work, which is why more days off would be less likely to help than our regular timetable. Having 48 hours of rest after five days of labour is what makes them special; they leave us the time to do what we want without altering our perception of worktime being the main reason why we sustain ourselves. Linking Words
Therefore
, 72 hours Linking Words
instead
of the standard 48 would probably make us ungrateful for the spare time given to us, since we did not work as much to deserve it. Linking Words
For instance
, coming home to a 72-hour-long pause could potentially make us less eager to make the most out of it since it is not as hard-earned as before.
Production speed is crucial in modern societies since it sustains the economy, Linking Words
thus
guaranteeing sustainable employment conditions. Linking Words
However
, if employees were authorised to have a longer break, Linking Words
this
decision could negatively impact society because production would drop and cause economic instability in the country. Linking Words
For example
, in the Dominican Republic, in 1999, the people were granted a free Monday. Linking Words
Consequently
, the carbon extraction business , on which the country deeply relied in terms of revenue, started to sell less carbon , and the economy fell.
Linking Words
To conclude
, some individuals would like to have a longer break. Linking Words
Nonetheless
, I think Linking Words
this
decision could trigger a lack of motivation in employees and a loss in terms of production that could negatively influence the economy.Linking Words