Long distance flight consumes the amount of fuel that a car uses for many years and pollutes the air. Some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourists travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Fuel consumption of a long-distance aeroplane is significantly higher than a car uses for the years. Some

people

Use synonyms

believe that non-commercial

flights

Use synonyms

should be discouraged for tourism in order to reduce

air

Use synonyms

pollution,

instead

Linking Words

of restricting the

number

Use synonyms

of

cars

Use synonyms

on the streets. In my opinion,

i

Fix capitalization

I

show examples

completely agree with

this

Linking Words

statement, non-essential

flights

Use synonyms

should be restricted, and sustainable

alternative

Use synonyms

methods should be prioritised. One of the primary reasons for reducing unnecessary

flights

Use synonyms

is to protect the environment.

Air

Use synonyms

travel consumes a significant amount of fuel regardless of its travelling distance, and pollutes the

air

Use synonyms

by emitting higher carbon dioxide. Recent research has found that

,

Punctuation problem

apply

show examples

aviation contributes 4% of the world's total carbon dioxide emissions

,

Punctuation problem

apply

show examples

and causes global warming and climate change.

Therefore

Linking Words

, reducing the

number

Use synonyms

of non-essential

flights

Use synonyms

means having a positive impact on environmental issues.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, aviation

companies

Use synonyms

are

also

Linking Words

exploring the option to introduce greener planes, which will run through

alternative

Use synonyms

and sustainable energy sources, and will reduce dependence on fossil

fuel

Fix the agreement mistake

fuels

show examples

.

Hence

Linking Words

, the government should introduce policies for individuals and

companies

Use synonyms

to commute with

alternative

Use synonyms

options until the flight changes to eco-friendly energies.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, I believe that there is no need to reduce the

number

Use synonyms

of

cars

Use synonyms

in big cities.

Instead

Linking Words

, the government should make

cars

Use synonyms

which use renewable energy sources. In the UK,

for example

Linking Words

, the authority has introduced a new law for car production

companies

Use synonyms

, that all

cars

Use synonyms

from 2030 should be run by electricity.

As a result

Linking Words

,

cars

Use synonyms

would not need to depend on fossil fuels, which

is

Correct subject-verb agreement

are

show examples

the main cause of environmental issues.

In addition

Linking Words

, tourism via planes is not mandatory

,

Punctuation problem

;

show examples

people

Use synonyms

can use

alternative

Use synonyms

options

Linking Words

such

Punctuation problem

, such

show examples

, cruise ships

,

Punctuation problem

apply

show examples

or fast trains. Many

people

Use synonyms

travel around the world via cruise ships, and it not only entertains individuals but

also

Linking Words

keeps economical growth for the country. In conclusion,

instead

Linking Words

of reducing the

number

Use synonyms

of

cars

Use synonyms

, authorities should consider decreasing the

number

Use synonyms

of

air

Use synonyms

travels. I believe that

,

Punctuation problem

apply

show examples

non-essential

flights

Use synonyms

are not necessary for tourism

,

Punctuation problem

;

show examples

people

Use synonyms

can rather travel by

alternative

Use synonyms

options. And I

also

Linking Words

argue that aviation

companies

Use synonyms

should focus on introducing greener planes in the near future, so that

,

Punctuation problem

apply

show examples

we can protect the world by reducing the environmental issues.