In some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partner. Discuss both systems and state which one do you think is better.

People in different countries have different view about how marriages should be arranged. While the partners that parents choose for their kids might be the suitable ones, I believe the children have the right to decide who they want to marry. On the one hand, the only reason parents want to interfere in marriage decisions is because of their children's happiness. With the life experience they have gained through the years, they know exactly which requirements of the partner are needed in a healthy and stable marriage. An adult with ideal family backgrounds or a job with lots of potential promotion would be in any cases more preferable than someone who is unemployed and still rely on their parents. Parents might also introduce their friends' children to their own sons and daughters because they trust that their friends would be kind to their kids as parent-in-laws. On the other hand, I believe marriages should be built based on love. A person might get married to somebody with excellent material conditions and without any emotional attraction to them, but no one could guarantee that it would be a precise decision. The core value of any marriage is understanding and sacrifice to each other. Both husbands and wives need to tries their best to become a better person not only for themselves but also for their spouses and future children. Therefore, everyone should have the right to meet and fall in love then choose the one who they think is the most suitable to be their future partner. In conclusion, while I understand the tradition of arranged marriage in some countries, I am certain that the choice of spouses only belongs to the two people who directly involve in the marriage.
Submitted by The expense of living is higher in developed nations and it affects directly to citizens and society. In this essay, I will express this issue and some resolves. People living in the US or any European country would face daily expensive cost and it affects directly to every citizen and society. Firstly, It forces adult individuals to work in most of the time and takes away enjoyable moments in their lives. For instance, a direct salesman in car dealers usually conducts their tasks from 6 am to 8 pm to maximum volume of sales and meet daily costs. Secondly, this fact creates a bunch of homeless people, who come from both white-collar and blue-collar workers. In Silicon Valley, teachers, bankers or staffs of governments live in track, which is normal images that local people see every day. The best way is that governments and corporation must act together. In the US, authorities in some province encourage real estate companies to build more houses and apartments, they act to remove and shrink terms, conditions in certain sectors. Some also decrease business tax massively to attract large conglomerate. It results in thousands of apartments, house, which appear at the edge of cities or state. Let’s take Google corporation is an example, they proactively associated with state government and sponsor to provide low-cost houses in Silicon Valley for their employees and valley citizens. High cost in developed countries and other issues always happens in different contexts, hence individuals, corporation, and authorities must act and take their responsibility in life and our society. on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users