More and more people are buying a wide range of household goods. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?

with the proliferation of cutting-edge technologies , many people are owning a wide range of household appliances. although this trend can be beneficial to human and manufactures, I believe that in the long run, it would be detrimental to the environment. It is reasonable why this development is considered temporarily positive. First, many modern products such as television , microwave oven and rice cooker can meet human's demand on a daily basis and make their life become more effective and efficient. Microwave oven is a typical example since with the pivotal function, this may help them reheat the foods quickly. Also, these modern goods for home can enhance their living standard. Second, the more people purchase household goods , the more manufacturers produce. This development will expand the market, which is entirely beneficial to companies. However, in the long run, I think that this consumption trend can be negative. Owning numerous household appliances is one of the common forms of excess consumerism. Although their products are still in a good condition, people are likely to buy and own new appliances for their home. This development can be harmful to the environment since people will dispose large amounts of waste when replacing their owned devices. It is believed that it takes waste hundred years to decompose. Therefore , excessive consumption can lead to the degradation of environment as well as natural disasters that next generations will suffer. In conclusion, the development of shopping household products might seem to benefit at first glance. Nevertheless, in the long run, this will exert many negative consequences on the environment and human's life.
Submitted by The expense of living is higher in developed nations and it affects directly to citizens and society. In this essay, I will express this issue and some resolves. People living in the US or any European country would face daily expensive cost and it affects directly to every citizen and society. Firstly, It forces adult individuals to work in most of the time and takes away enjoyable moments in their lives. For instance, a direct salesman in car dealers usually conducts their tasks from 6 am to 8 pm to maximum volume of sales and meet daily costs. Secondly, this fact creates a bunch of homeless people, who come from both white-collar and blue-collar workers. In Silicon Valley, teachers, bankers or staffs of governments live in track, which is normal images that local people see every day. The best way is that governments and corporation must act together. In the US, authorities in some province encourage real estate companies to build more houses and apartments, they act to remove and shrink terms, conditions in certain sectors. Some also decrease business tax massively to attract large conglomerate. It results in thousands of apartments, house, which appear at the edge of cities or state. Let’s take Google corporation is an example, they proactively associated with state government and sponsor to provide low-cost houses in Silicon Valley for their employees and valley citizens. High cost in developed countries and other issues always happens in different contexts, hence individuals, corporation, and authorities must act and take their responsibility in life and our society. on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users

Recent essays: