It's standard that animal experiments
are widely use
are widely used
are widely using
a new medicine
of other products many people argue that these should be banned simply because it's morally wrong to cause
to suffer, while
plural of other; the people or things not already mentioned
are in a
of them as they move benefits to humanity. In my opinion, the traditional practice should be upheld for the following reasons.
, it's much more expensive than alternative and less effective than those safe, harmless other methods that don't harm living creatures.
In other words
, animal experimentation is about 92% ineffective overall, even the animal experiments that are approved have little chance of succeeding when tested on these innocent creatures that haven't done anything to us.
are numerous pros and construction of animal testing, the ethical aspect overshadows both of them.
, the emotion
having the power or quality of deciding
factor in whether a person believe the benefits of animal testing outweigh the problem associated with the practice
as animal and human are never exactly the same.
Another reason for the current practice to be upheld, is that it gives room for researchers to find drug and treatment to various
of diseases and
gives room to improve health and medicine. Many medical
have been made possible by animal
cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. It
to ensure the
of the drugs and many other substances human
or are exposed to regularly, drugs
can carry significant dangers with their
animal testing allows researchers to
thereby reduce human harm and human lives are saved.
To sum up, in recent times, animal testing
are predominantly being used
is predominantly being used
in creating new drug and ascertaining the
of other products. Many people have argued that it's unethical and should be prohibited, because it subject the test subject to pain. Other with a contrary opinion to
, say that the benefits to humanity can't be quantified and stated.