Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

Well developed nations are supposed to help lesser nations with charity in situations of disasters that are related to nature.

This

essay agrees with the statement because the act of helping others proves these

countries

Suggestion

country

humane and doing

this

will not affect their

economy

negatively. The act of helping others will prove these

countries

Suggestion

country

humane. It is only a normal human response to respond to the suffering of others by helping them out with whatever thing they need at that point and

this

can be seen in nations helping nations. A very good example that portrays

this

is the help that was received by the Asian

country

Nepal, which is a less developed nation, when they experienced their

first

volcanic eruption in 10years, in 2002. A relief was sent to

this

country

by the United States. So other rich countries can learn from

this

as well and be well concerned about their less privileged neighbours.

This

will prove their humanity.

Moreso

, doing

this

will not affect these countries'

economy

negatively. Since these countries are well developed in all aspects and are very rich, it will cost them absolutely nothing helping other nations who are less privileged. Since they have nothing to lose, it will only make sense to help. A study carried out in 2003 on the United States'

economy

showed that there was a 10% increase in the

country

's gross domestic product, which is directly proportional to the increase in the wealth of the nation.

This

was around the time that they helped the

country

Nepal. So rather than

have

Suggestion

having

a loss, it is seen that

this

country

rather increased in its wealth. To conclude, rich countries should provide assistance to poorer countries facing naturally occurring disasters because it is an act of humanity and it will cost their

economy

nothing to do so.