Nowadays, the invasion of
of famous people,
as celebrities, on mass media has been receiving a great deal of public attention.
the media somehow violates and gives more attention to the private lives, there is no need to give extra protection to them.
with, since famous people have profound influences on the public, their personal lives would be a target of the media.
In other words
, news about public figures would be attractive to a number of audiences who are fans and concerned about their idols’ lives, which guarantees a profit for the news’ owner.
, once a famous person has a flaw, he would be criticized more strictly than an ordinary one would be.
, a singer wears a bag made of an animal hide, which encourages her fans to do the same thing. It is essential for the media
against her action more strictly than the same act of an ordinary one.
On the other hand
, giving more concerns about
famous figures’ personal lives
the famous figures’ personal lives
should be taken into account.
, it is true that personal
is a radical demand for each person,
, famous ones are
in need. In fact, some celebrities are miserable that they even lose their freedom at home because there are many paparazzi around their homes watching and capturing them any time.
, offering a special treat for their
may exaggerate the issue because they are capable of prosecuting who are invading their personal life.
should be considered a crime.
In conclusion, a popular figure is merely a person who needs the
for himself. While the media ought to respect his
demand in order to avoid committing an
a lack of politeness; a failure to show regard for others; wounding the feelings or others
, having more personal
should be treated by his