It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Budget utilization by countries requires careful decisions.
Although
it is commonly stated that states utilized behemoth
amount
of
money
to ensure the safety of wildlife other sectors are more crucial to look after. I partially agree with the statement, and in my opinion, governments should spend
little
Suggestion
less
amount
of
money
on wild
animals
Suggestion
animal
protections and more on other sectors
such
as health and education. Admittedly, there ought to be some basic
amount
of utilization of
money
on
Suggestion
for
the survival and betterment of wildlife. Wild animal habitat protection and maintenance is beneficial, in terms of the flourishing of tourism. Which in turn means, the economic growth of a
country
, as
tourists
Suggestion
tourist
influx can lead significantly to more revenue generation.
For example
, the economic organization of Indonesia has revealed a report that, the
country
has
gain
Suggestion
gained
5% increase
Suggestion
a 5 % increase
in revenue, with the greatest wild living manifestation the
country
possess
Suggestion
possesses
.
Therefore
, allocating a little
amount
of cost is advantageous up to some extent for a
country
.
However
, the government should consider and utilize
major
Suggestion
the major amount
amount
of
money
on other critical areas
such
as education and health.
Firstly
, spending enormous
amount
of finance on learning
sector
is vitally important, as more literate number of people means the
prospering
Suggestion
prosperity
of a society. Which in turn means, high employment and working for the development of a
country
.
Secondly
, health
sector
ought to be taken
in to
expresses motion to a point on, or within, something
into
consideration highly while utilizing
money
.
This
is because
this
area faces certain problems
such
as lack of proper medical equipment and different medicines, especially in underdeveloped countries. In Pakistan,
for instance
, the government is allocating 33% of
budget
Suggestion
the budget
on the medical
sector
, owing to the rising problems in it.
Thus
,
money
should be spend
Suggestion
should be spent
in areas which are more vital by the state. In conclusion, people believe that countries spend more on unimportant
sector
like wildlife and other crucial areas are there which should not be neglected. In my view, states ought to allocate
minor
Suggestion
a minor amount
minor amounts
amount
on wild living
sector
and significant
amount
on
Suggestion
of
other essential areas like
medical
Suggestion
medicine
and education.
Submitted by jamaluetian92 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • biodiversity
  • ecological balance
  • safeguard
  • natural habitats
  • foster
  • cultural of conservation
  • long-term ecological sustainability
  • economic benefits
  • significant source of revenue
  • investment
  • nation’s economic wealth
  • preservation of ecosystems
  • clean water and air
  • prioritization
  • multi-faceted government budgets
  • environmental protection
  • wildlife conservation
  • neglecting
  • detrimental effects
What to do next:
Look at other essays: