The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amounts of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that a huge amount of
money
has been spent on building preservation in many cities. To some extent
I agree that Add a comma
extent,
governments
prioritise the development of new housing and infrastructure, but I would also
argue that we do need to restore and preserve old buildings
that have a cultural identity
. On the one hand, I accept the idea that governments
should put a priority on the new development of housing and infrastructure because it certainly improves people’s lives. First of all, governments
have to ensure the provision of adequate housing. There needs to be affordable and comfortable housing for all different family structure
, considering the current situation where we are moving towards the culture of nuclear families and changing Fix the agreement mistake
structures
lifestyle
. Fix the agreement mistake
lifestyles
As well as
housing provision, it would be one of the biggest jobs for governments
to establish a proper public transport system so that people could travel to work or college without stress. Also
, spending more money
on developing new public facilities, such
as schools, hospitals, police stations, and parks could result in providing more
enjoyable and easy life. Correct article usage
a more
However
, I would argue that it is essential for a country to spend money
on restoring or preserving old buildings
because they
deeply related to cultural Add a verb
they are
they were
identity
which should be maintained. One good example would be Japan’s ancient city, Kyoto. They have preserved its historical buildings
for centuries. Its governments
have been spending a great deal of time, money
and effort on setting up building regulations or implementing campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the importance of historical building preservation. As a result
, the city landscape is very well preserved, and it attracts around 3.6 million foreign visitors every year, because of its unique historical identity
. Without such
an effort, their cultural identity
would have disappeared along with
its unique cultural landscape. In conclusion, while
I understand that new developments bring an overall
improvement in people’s quality of life, I believe that it is important to restore old buildings
in terms of preservation
of cultural Correct article usage
the preservation
identity
.Submitted by i2ujkg0u843o on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.
A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).
Stick to this essay structure:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion