The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amounts of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that a huge amount of
money
has been spent on building preservation in many cities. To some
extent
Add a comma
extent,
show examples
I agree that
governments
prioritise the development of new housing and infrastructure, but I would
also
argue that we do need to restore and preserve old
buildings
that have a cultural
identity
. On the one hand, I accept the idea that
governments
should put a priority on the new development of housing and infrastructure because it certainly improves people’s lives. First of all,
governments
have to ensure the provision of adequate housing. There needs to be affordable and comfortable housing for all different family
structure
Fix the agreement mistake
structures
show examples
, considering the current situation where we are moving towards the culture of nuclear families and changing
lifestyle
Fix the agreement mistake
lifestyles
show examples
.
As well as
housing provision, it would be one of the biggest jobs for
governments
to establish a proper public transport system so that people could travel to work or college without stress.
Also
, spending more
money
on developing new public facilities,
such
as schools, hospitals, police stations, and parks could result in providing
more
Correct article usage
a more
show examples
enjoyable and easy life.
However
, I would argue that it is essential for a country to spend
money
on restoring or preserving old
buildings
because
they
Add a verb
they are
they were
show examples
deeply related to cultural
identity
which should be maintained. One good example would be Japan’s ancient city, Kyoto. They have preserved its historical
buildings
for centuries. Its
governments
have been spending a great deal of time,
money
and effort on setting up building regulations or implementing campaigns aimed at raising awareness of the importance of historical building preservation.
As a result
, the city landscape is very well preserved, and it attracts around 3.6 million foreign visitors every year, because of its unique historical
identity
. Without
such
an effort, their cultural
identity
would have disappeared
along with
its unique cultural landscape. In conclusion,
while
I understand that new developments bring an
overall
improvement in people’s quality of life, I believe that it is important to restore old
buildings
in terms of
preservation
Correct article usage
the preservation
show examples
of cultural
identity
.
Submitted by i2ujkg0u843o on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs

The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format.

A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences).

Stick to this essay structure:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Cultural heritage
  • Historical significance
  • Urban charm
  • Tourism
  • Revitalizing the economy
  • Aesthetic appeal
  • Environmental sustainability
  • New construction
  • Urban development
  • Infrastructure
  • Cost-effective
  • Long-term benefits
  • Immediate needs
  • Living standards
What to do next:
Look at other essays: