Nowadays it is noticed that cultural mixing is reflected within local cultural practices. Do you think it is good for our society?

In

this

era of globalization, boundaries –political, geographical, cultural–are being removed as peoples blend and persons share, with each other, the very values that once segregated them. Cultural mixing has begun tearing down all the

ethnical

of or relating to the philosophical study of ethics

ethical

and racial pigeonholes and move us closer, by the day, towards one universal race of humans. Like all else, even

this

has its occasional downsides, which, when put in comparison with the upsides, are negligible.

Firstly

, we have to consider that cultural mixing is perhaps the only non-coercive way to move global humanity towards ideal equality, a belief sought for by all the great persons, and political and religious ideologies. While many have struggled throughout human history to uproot tyranny, oppression, bigotry and segregation, their paths have been tainted by the blood of the bold and tears of the beautiful. True that we, through our ravaging revolutions, have progressed, but at a cost that undoubtedly has been

dear

stubbornly unyielding

dour

. Cultural mixing,

on the other hand

, is the benedictory prophet, who ushers the great communion of all men in empathy, leaving behind all ethos, and he comes only in peace. Yet, some conservatives argue that free-mixing of cultural values degrade people’s sense of morality. They must be conveniently forgetful of all the immoralities, in the name of conservation, that evidently have tarnished human history.

Although

, it is undeniable that cultural mixing, like any other progressive enterprise, has coincided with social

unpleasantries

,

for

example declining

Accept comma addition

example, declining

stability among families in the

third

world countries, the blame has not yet been rationally put. And, of course, there are many other

socio-economic

involving social as well as economic factors

socioeconomic

controllers

such

as wage-earning, and individualism that may very well be responsible for today’s social ills. In sum, we must not be closed-minded to the global brethren cultures, because, only by doing

this

we may, one day, realize the ever-cherished dreamland of universal humanity, where “… all the people, sharing the world in peace” will not be only a thing of imagination.