Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Over the past decades, environmental issues have been increasingly recognized. Many solutions are proposed to tackle these problems, one of which is to increase the fuel cost for vehicles in order to cut off the exhaust fumes emitted into the surroundings when people are travelling. From my perspective, I totally disapprove of
this
idea. It is obviously seen that, in case the authorities incline fuel price,
such
action merely poses a difficulty to the citizens. People are pressured to spend more money on buying
fuels
Suggestion
fuel
for their transportation demands.
Consequently
, at that point, they are able to save less money every month.
This
phenomena
is expected
Suggestion
are expected
to result in the deterioration of living conditions since when a large shortage of money emerges, the residents will not afford as
much
Suggestion
many
amenities as they did before.
Furthermore
, in the long run,
this
implication could lead to wider social gap because middle-level and below families are severely affected by
this
trend.
On the other hand
, many opponents might argue that there are several alternative approaches that need to be put in practice. For commutation, one successful model is to enhance public transportation systems, which encourages the use of people across the country from all levels with fair prices. In fact, the more passengers use public transportation, the more volume of vehicles on the roads drop, which enables fresh air.
Therefore
,
this
proposal is believed to not only bridge the social gap, but
also avoid
Suggestion
also avoids
the traffic congestion. In conclusion, increasing the price of fuels is not an appropriate method to reduce environmental pollution.
Such
way imposes more drawbacks than benefits, so the government is supposed to launch alternative policies and laws for the residents to be environmentally-friendly while commuting.
Submitted by Thanh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Environmental preservation
  • Sustainable transportation
  • Green technologies
  • Alternative energy sources
  • Renewable energy
  • Fuel-efficient vehicles
  • Electric vehicles (EVs)
  • Public transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic impact
  • Consumer behavior
  • Disproportionate effect
  • Government subsidies
  • Comprehensive policies
  • Cost-effective solutions
  • Carbon footprint reduction
What to do next:
Look at other essays: