Increasing car usage in many large global cities has caused a number of problems. Some cities have proposed banning private vehicles from the city centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Owing to the hazard experienced by citizens in the world, due to the rise in the numbers of vehicles in the metropolis, a quantum of places have decided to restrict these cars from the major places in the city. In my opinion, I strongly agree that restrictions by enforced so that heavy traffic can reduce and health challenges can be curbed.

Firstly

, the ban on cars will cause a decrease in health and environmental challenges.

In other words

, the poisonous gas emitted from these cars will reduce, leading to protection of

ozone layer

Suggestion

the ozone layer

, low cases of lung cancer and likely diseases.

For instance

, the National Environmental Agency in Ghana, reported that the volume if Carbon monoxide in the atmosphere has reduced from 70% in 2006 to 30% in 2010, when the government made a rule to address the private drivers. Another point to consider, is the fact that

this

law will ease movement.

That is

, people can get to their destinations easily and quickly because the amount of cars on the roads would have dropped.

Consequently

, there will be no gridlock and the havoc caused by

this

will be prevented. Problems

such

as missing appointments, losing businesses, tiredness and excess fund on fuel will all be halted.

For example

, after the embargo in the USA on own drivers in the cities, the citizens said they are better and get commendations from their employers for punctuality. In conclusion, the rule against private drivers on major roads will be effective in reducing health and environmental issues and improving movements.