The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree?

You should prevent health problems and illness from occurring rather than having treatments and taking medicines. Government has to distribute moneys based on

this

. I can’t agree with

this

opinion completely because I think that

this

it has both positive and negative aspects.

First

of all, I will discuss an advantage of the opinion. In general, therapy and

medicine

are more expensive than

prevention

of diseases.

For example

, if you get a cold and have a high fever, you have to go to see a doctor and you will pay a lot of

money

for the diagnosis and

medicine

. If you would like to keep yourself from getting a cold, you have to just wash your hands and mouth before you enter the house or eat food.

Also

, its cost is not expensive. So, you don’t have to pay a lot and have to do just easy things for

prevention

of health problems and illness.

In contrast

, I will write about

disadvantages

Suggestion

the disadvantages

. Paying

money

for preventing health problems means paying

money

for healthy people. So, you pay

money

though you are effectively healthy.

This

expense may not be

need

Suggestion

needed

.

and

Suggestion

And

,

Accept space

,

some diseases are difficult to prevent,

for example

, some types of cancer. I consider that treatment and

medicine

is significant as well as

prevention

for those illnesses and you

also

have to use

money

Suggestion

the money

for the therapy and

medicine

. In conclusion,

this

opinion is double edged sword, so I can’t agree fully. It is important to use

money

depending on cases.

For instance

, in case of diseases which are relatively prevented with ease, you should pay for the

prevention

more.