Many people believe that having a fix punishment for all crime is more efficient. What are the advantage and disadvantages of having a fix punishment?

It is considered by some people that giving a

fixes

Suggestion

fix

punishment

for all criminal acts is more effective. There are certain merits and demerits of implementing a fixed

punishment

for all crimes. There are several positive outcomes of fixed

punishment

.

To begin

with, the fixed

punishment

is productive in the case when someone is influential or wealthy. Without considering the person influence, it

is deterrent for

Suggestion

is a deterrent for

people who are influential, as they would come to know that they would get a same

punishment

, no matter how much money or influence they possess. There are people who may manipulate the court decision, by the use of money, but the presence of a fixed

punishment

, the decision of the sentencing could not be changed in the court of law.

This

, in turn, means the criminal offences would reduced, as the results and

punishment

would remain the same for the rich and the poor. Another beneficial aspect is that fixed

punishment

for each

crime

, reduces the

crime

rate enormously.

This

is because due to the presence of the stringent

policy

regarding a

punishment

for a specific

crime

, it would be hard for people to think about a

crime

, as they would be aware of the repercussions of it.

This

, in turn, means when opting for a

crime

there would be no thinking about the ease in the

punishment

policy

in the criminal mind. A recent report by the International Criminal Organization,

for example

, showed that after announcing an exact

policy

for each

crime

, results in reducing

crime

from

Suggestion

by

60% to 25% in Ireland.

However

, there are several downsides to

this

policy

.

Firstly

, it is detrimental for people who opt for a

crime

or offence in defence. Giving the exact same

punishment

to a person who attempt a murder while defending himself or family members is disastrous for him.

In other words

, there are people in society who take an offensive action, owing to safe themselves from getting

harm

Suggestion

harmed

. Research by Oxford University,

for instance

, showed that 10% death sentences to people in Malaysia,

are

introduces an alternative

or

to those who have murdered someone, in the self-defence.

Thus

, it results in destroying the life of an individual and his family members.

Secondly

, teenagers may be affected badly by giving the harsh

punishment

for their actions, which they have undergone unintentionally. Younger people due to their inexperienced nature, may opt for a

crime

, which would be

done

produced by a manufacturing process

made

from them, as they would not be able to avoid it, for which they may get

punishment

Suggestion

punished

.

This

, in turn, would damage their character and is highly likely to motivate them to

further

crime

. In conclusion, it is argued that a fixed

punishment

is having productive outcomes. The advantages of

this

policy

are that the influential people would receive the same

punishment

and reducing the

crime

, as well as the drawbacks are that it may be disastrous for people who opt for offence in self-protection and teenagers may become highly vulnerable to

further

crime

.