In many countries, the government prioritises economic growth above all other concerns. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion.

It is argued that in some nations, the states give priority to economic

growth

as compared to the other concerns. While the main advantage of

this

approach is better living standards, I believe that it can affect

health

and

education

for the general public. The primary advantage of prioritizing economic

growth

is that it can improve living standards and reduce the

poverty

rate

.

In other words

, high average incomes enable consumers to enjoy more goods and services and a better lifestyle.

This

means that people will have more income that will eventually reduce the

poverty

rate

.

For example

, a recent report published by

BBC

Suggestion

the BBC

suggested that economic

growth

in the twentieth century was a major factor in reducing absolute levels of

poverty

and enabling a rise in life expectancy. Despite

this

, I think that the government should

also

take care of the

health

of people and provide them the best

education

services. The major drawback of

this

approach is that it can affect

health

services and

education

facilities for the citizens of the country because they are not prioritized.

That is

to say that public services will not get adequate funds to spend on improving

health

care facilities and

education

services for the citizens.

As a result

, it will lower the literacy

rate

and people will encounter with diseases.

For instance

, according to a recent survey by the Guardian the countries like China that give more importance to economic

growth

, 35% of the people from these countries are suffering from serious

health

issues. In conclusion,

although

prioritizing economic

growth

is beneficial because it increases the living standards and reduces the

poverty

rate

, I believe that poor

health

facilities and

education

are a major drawback.