Director and mangers are mostly older people. Some people believe young people will become better leaders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is usually seen that older people are posted at the directorial or managerial level; related to

this

, it is thought by some people that youthful people will be better leaders than the elderly ones. While I agree, young generation should be considered for being leaders, if they are equally talented and capable;

however

, when it comes to critical decision making, age and experience does matter.

Firstly

, new generation people are physically and mentally healthier than the old generation, which directly indicates that along with maintaining

energetic environment

Suggestion

an energetic environment

at work, they are capable of handling more stress and pressure, which is a fundamental part of leadership. Another factor that should be taken

in

Suggestion

into

account is youngsters are more up-to-date with modern technology, whose incorporation will gradually benefit the organization. Deliberate and deep knowledge of advanced techniques is another important quality of a leader.

On the other hand

, lessons learned from

live

Suggestion

life

experience plays a critical role in a leader's life, as the theoretical learning can not be always sufficient when some serious situations occur. At that very moment, only an experienced person can guide the team on how to tackle the problem in a better way. While providing solutions, aged people, due to

ample amount

Suggestion

the ample amount

an ample amount

of knowledge, might help a company to take risk free better decisions with respect to growth and development. In my opinion,

although

young age leaders might bring innovative and enthusiastic methods when given equal opportunities to showcase their talent, older managers will

also

remain a relevant asset of a company. It

thus

leaves us with a conclusion that age does affect.