Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A large number of historic and celebrated museums across the world charge an
admission
fee
, while others of national importance waive
such
a cost. In my opinion, museums that charge a
fee
to their guests commit a colossal disservice to the uniform educational progress and intellectual development of all sections of society. Granted that there are advantages of charging an
admission
fee
, but the disadvantages dwarf the same. We all grow up reading about the invaluable treasure of paintings, sculptures, archaeological discoveries and much more preserved in these museums, but to actually be able to ‘see’ them is an incredibly romantic feeling.
Hence
, numerous countries spend millions of dollars to create new museums
such
as The Louvre in Abu Dhabi.
However
, if the entry charges were free it would attract a far higher quantity of visitors. An obvious and relevant advantage of charging a
fee
to visitors of a
museum
is using the funds to ensure that the pieces of art are restored and kept in top order.
Furthermore
, the
admission
fee
could be used to accrue additional pieces that would allow the variety of
artifacts
a man-made object taken as a whole
artefacts
displayed in these museums to increase.
Moreover
, the
fee
would enable museums to arrange special temporary exhibits that can benefit both the artist, as well as the population that comes to view these works of art. Given that, the biggest drawback of charging an
admission
fee
is that it negates the idea of educating the public about pieces that chronicle the ancient past while
also
informing them about contemporary advances. The main aim of having museums in every part of the world is to house visual proof of evolution and accomplishments.
This
ability to witness history and the future should ideally be available to everybody - from the poor to the rich, from students to professionals, and so on.
This
purpose will be significantly defeated if the patrons are expected to choose between having a meal and enjoying educational entertainment.
For instance
, The Louvre in France is one of the recognized museums in the world that proudly hosts famous and incredible relics
such
as the Mona Lisa, the Madonna of the Rocks, the Aphrodite statue, quite a few of Raphael's works etc. It attracts millions of tourists every
year but
Accept comma addition
year, but
simultaneously it is a pity that many more millions are deprived of the pleasure of viewing these, due to the entry charges.
On the other hand
, several countries in the Middle East,
for
example Bahrain
Accept comma addition
example, Bahrain
, offer free entrance to locals and tourists
alike
Accept comma addition
alike, thus
thus
ensuring that both communities involve a
museum
visit into their itinerary. Antiques need constant maintenance and
this
costs money. I think that the cost of
this
amelioration should be borne by the
government
. The
government
should be responsible for the cost of restoration and preservation of cultural antiquities just as it is for infrastructure, water, etc. The
government
in some places
such
as New York City offers a reduced price to students for visiting museums. In my view, it still limits attendance as a considerable percentage of the students in the city would find it difficult to pay even the scaled-down value. Undeniably charging an
admission
fee
to patrons of a
museum
has both advantages and disadvantages.
However
, I will conclude by saying that the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages. The advantage of charging a
fee
is the cost-benefit it offers to the
museum
. It is my firm belief that the
government
, and the rich patrons in the society, can and must endure
this
expense. I would,
therefore
, extrapolate that
admission
to museums ought to be free of charge.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Admission fee
  • Revenue stream
  • Maintenance
  • Overcrowding
  • Commercialization
  • Cultural heritage
  • Diverse attendance
  • Community ownership
  • Access to culture
  • Visitor experience
  • Exhibit quality
  • Cultural mission
  • Reliance on funding
  • Government subsidies
  • Cultural accessibility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: