Schools should cut out music to focus on subjects such as information technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some believe that

art

and

music

should be removed from the syllabus of education to enable young students to concentrate on more valuable materials, namely, information technology. In my opinion, I disagree because

although

other subjects are crucial to learning,

music

is significant in shaping and nurturing creativity. Education should aim at equipping children of today with knowledge and skills to be able to compete with the future’s challenges.

This

is because the world never cease developing, and the same goes for the educational materials in continuous relentless evolving.

For example

, the introduction of the computer sciences as a compulsory course in Finland’s elementary schools aimed at bringing about their future generation with ample expertise in dealing with technology.

Thus

, if the period requires different materials, the learning process would change to cope with it.

However

,

art

is not only an integral part of any civilization, but

also

an indispensable subject. If world devoid

art

,

then

we would be living in a concrete community.

Moreover

, schools should not eliminate

art

because it supplements other topics, rejuvenates spirits, and ignites creativity.

For instance

, many students would have the opportunity to learn about

music

in school, which may motivate them to pursue a career in it.

Therefore

,

although

time is consumed to hone skills in spiritual courses

such

as

music

, they enrich mental abilities and complete the objective of other classes at another level. In conclusion, giving priority to other mundane courses over spiritual ones is a moot issue. I disagree with the notion if education syllabus is excluded from

art

courses, children would be deprived of the opportunity of discovering their innate talents and the possibilities that may provide.