It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

It is true that humans can now set foot in wild regions far away from civilisation. While I accept that

this

development can have certain benefits for the human race, I believe that it is likely to have a harmful impact on nature. On the one hand, undertaking expeditions to the wilderness can be valuable in terms of both science and recreation. There are a considerable number of undiscovered secrets that can be tremendously useful for researchers to conduct their studies.

For instance

, environmental scientists can analyse the data about the thickness of ice layers over millions of years in both hemispheres to predict the possible changes in global temperatures.

Such

findings are crucial for the governments to develop appropriate plans to alleviate global warming.

Furthermore

, the untouched beauty of these areas is usually appealing to travellers, providing people with an attractive option of holiday destination or excursion.

However

, I would argue that these positive aspects are outweighed by the drawbacks. When people are given full and easy access to the distant and

unpopulated

areas, there are likely to be more moving there to reside or start their business. It has been shown that substantial damage has been done to

nature

Accept comma addition

nature, such

such

as massive deforestation or water contamination due to humans’ lack of environmental awareness. If there is inadequate protection of the environment

from

Suggestion

for

this

type of action, wild regions in the world will no longer exist, unspeakably affecting not only the overall ecology but

also

the lives of other people. In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of travelling to wild environments

are

Suggestion

Are

more significant than the possible benefits for the mentioned reasons.