Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies, while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Robots are likely to become as ubiquitous as the smartphone computers we all carry in our

future

society. While some people argue that robots might have negative impacts on the

future

community, I believe that the benefits of the robot are likely to outweigh the negative aspects of it. On the one hand, there are two main reasons why it could be argued that robots might have adverse effects on civilization in the

future

.

Firstly

, some people believe that robots will harm the human workforce. The people will be replaced by machines and

this

will increase the unemployment rate.

As a result

, many other problems may emerge,

such

as poverty and increased crimes.

Secondly

, people will become more dependent on robots in their daily life and

this

may harmfully affect their skills like cooking and driving. So people become less active and

this

may result in some health problems like obesity.

On the other hand

, I would agree with those who argue that robots will play important positive roles in

future

society. The

first

role is that robots could operate in locations that humans cannot reach

such

as exploration of the outer space. They can act as extended eyes for humans, enabling them to look beyond their visual boundaries.

Moreover

, robots will be used inside human bodies for monitoring their health and undertake surgery. The

second

role that will be played by robots is the helping of elderly and retired people with their daily life activities like cooking and cleaning.

Finally

, robots could do normal jobs quickly, unlike human beings. Robots don not complain or get distracted or tired. They readily work twenty-four hours and require minimal maintenance. To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons.

Therefore

, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on

this

subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of

this

, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.