Some people say that governments should spend money on measures to save languages that are used by few speakers, while others believe it is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the modern society, the variety of languages are regarded as the beauty of mankind's culture; what's more, the language of each nation is the special symbol as well as a tool to distinguish one thing from others. What is more, the minority languages are being fallen into oblivion, so the governments need to propose the best solutions to protect their language. Nowadays, there have been some opinions that it is costly if the states expend an abundance of money to solve. From my point of view, my belief is that
this
approach will have advantageous effects of contributing and developing the outlook of the languages substituting for letting them die out. From my perspective, the languages play a crucial role in creating the distinct and special attractions of the nation for the following rationales. What is more, thanks to
this
beauty, the records from one generation to other generations in order that the future generations can develop or receive more information and experiment form forefathers. Simultaneously, the literature works,
such
as poems, novels, short stories will have more opportunities to succeed in the future growth by preserving the variety of languages- the tool maintaining the meaning and messages to other countries.
Furthermore
,
this
method could connect people all over the globe, or build a good relationship between many lands of the world.
Consequently
, the mental and physical life of humans throughout the world is enhanced and improved quickly, so the disappearance of some languages had better be considered by the government across the world to have the better way so as to protect the beauty of languages.
Conversely
, it is proved that it is wasteful if paying too much money for saving minority languages. Learning and communicating via the languages require advanced conditions, like materials, facilities, instruction and pupils, to grow and sustain perfectly;
nonetheless
, the states have to spend a great amount of money and time on them.
This
investment is not necessary, for these languages are not popular in the globe.
In addition
, the states should develop the famous languages
such
as English, Chinese, Japanese and Spanish and so forth as a useful approach to information resources and communication in order to make relations between the nations more nearly and learn the good habits to enhance the culture of other nations.
Moreover
, it will make a change for the young generations to have the quality career in the future. From what I have discussed above, despite having some justifications for accepting for the disappearance of languages, I do believe that each individual needs to have an awareness of the role of languages in human life.
Otherwise
, the governments ought to
also
develop the popular languages in order to get a better life for their citizens. The more languages we save, the more cultural values we will discover.
Submitted by huamantiep on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: