It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages?

Remote natural places have become attractive to scientists and tourists these days.
However
, whether the trend will have
negative influence
Suggestion
a negative influence
on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly
, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches.
This
is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.
Moreover
, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which
can not
can not
cannot
be compared to other places they have been to.
This
could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature,
such
as the South Pole which
can not
can not
cannot
be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.
That is
not to say that there
is
Suggestion
are
no drawbacks of the practise. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere.
Consequently
the loss will be immense. In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors;
meanwhile
at the same time but in another place
Meanwhile
, these new comers need to restrict their behaviours. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.
Submitted by dickylaw1985 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: