In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue whether the government should spend their money on developing sports and arts for supporting professionals for mass people. A lion's share of the society favours development,
however
, the rest goes adverse and favours professionals. I do not completely agree with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should be encouraged to participate in these skills for their growth and development. Linking Words
This
is because, learners should have autonomy to choose, which help them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life. Linking Words
For example
, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the Neuro- cognitive development of these students who were involved in skills like sports or arts (music, painting, dancing). Linking Words
In contrast
, a strict supervision should be done on children so that they do not over indulge and loose concentration from academics. Linking Words
Subsequently
, they would perform mediocrity in both aspects of life.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, I believe bureaucrats should motivate the professional aspect of these skills. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism as well as generate revenue, which would help in boosting economy of a country. Linking Words
For instance
, in my own experience, I am a professional tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to Linking Words
this
. Linking Words
As a result
, I donate Linking Words
this
amount for the welfare of my state. Linking Words
However
, the athletes should not exploit Linking Words
this
gift for their personal benefits.
To conclude, it can be reiterated that spending on professional sports and cultural programs is imperative for the governments. Promoting sports in schools should Linking Words
also
be there, but not at the expense of professional sports and cultural events.Linking Words
shawonielts