In many places, new homes are needed , but the only space available for building them is in the country side. Some people beleive it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?

Many individuals are of the opinion that the integrity of the

countryside

should be maintained, thereby leaving it undeveloped. Other individuals,

on the other hand

, feel houses should be built where ever there is available land. While I understand the importance of maintaining the structure of

countryside

Suggestion

the countryside

; I think housing should be of uttermost importance and

therefore

, should not be at the expense of

other

any of various alternatives; some other

another

.......

Accept space

.......

There are many reasons why I take

this

stand.

First

, the structure of the

countryside

can be preserved using other means. These

includes

Suggestion

include

maintaining the original structure of the city landscape.

Also

, structures and buildings important to the history of the city should be kept clean and tidy for tourists. All these, in my view, will protect the

countryside

of unintended civilisation without unnecessarily denying citizens of

accoodation

making or becoming suitable; adjusting to circumstances

accommodation

.

Second

, building houses in an area of interest is not what really exposes the place to civilisation. I think other factors like migration of industries and air pollution associated with it brings about a more damaging effect than providing accomodation for indigent

indigenes

originating where it is found

indigenous

indigence

. In conclusion,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

think accomodation can be provided for individuals in need in the

countryside

without damaging the integrity of the

countryside

.