World history suggests that violance and conflict were more evident under male leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do u agree or disagree.

People can predict from history that there were less incidents of

violence

under female

leadership

as compared to male

leadership

. I wholeheartedly agree with the opinion that female leaderships are better in comparison and ought to be given more chances than males to overcome these issues.

To begin

with,

leadership

requires patience and commitment which many females definitely have. Women in general believe in peaceful discussions and they are really good at discussion, whether it be at home or in a political meeting.

For instance

, females run their houses in an amazing way. They do all the household work, take care of kids and be a boss at home when needed. They finish all their tasks and never back out from any missions when it comes to holding a family together. I believe that same applies to the management of a small company or a big country because they always try to be patient and committed to their work. While men believe in power and how to use it on others, women believe in using that power in a more positive way to help people. Where males like to set the rules for punishment against the

violence

, females

on the other hand

, believe in correcting the cause of

violence

. There are,

for instance

, many agencies out there which are run by females that help poor kids on the streets and teach them how to be more civilized. Not only

this

, but giving those kids an opportunity to earn money and live a decent life too.

Thus

females are always one step ahead when it comes to

leadership

with peace. In conclusion, I totally agree with the fact that females are known to be better at

leadership

than males when it comes to overcome

violence

and conflict. Hopefully, in future females will be given more chances than males to rule higher management.