When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, when expanding the new technology of a nation, an old technique and habits of life destroyed and it is not important to keep them lives in our life. I acknowledge that traditional talent and style of lives changed by technology. I do not believe that it is not important to preserve them. On the

first

hand, if a nation innovated a new technique after that the old way of working and people live would be

change

Suggestion

changed

because they can be

work

with the help of

recent service system

Suggestion

the recent service system

. Along with

this

, it is easy to use and less

time

consuming to learn.

Subsequently

, the new system would to reduce processing

time

and

also

the workload of

work

. In short,

new technology

Suggestion

the new technology

is

high

Suggestion

highly

demanded currently and people can change lives.

As a result

, the

past

(superlative of 'good') having the most positive qualities

best

technique of

work

can be a

crush

a wooden or metal staff that fits under the armpit and reaches to the ground; used by disabled person while walking

crutch

.

However

, It is important to collect familiar skills and try to use it because the basic knowledge of working, it is helpful in critical

time

. If we do not have enough equipment to experiment with new ideas at that

time

it can use for it.

Furthermore

, some formulas have not system detected or maybe misunderstood, at that

time

, ancient techniques are utilized.

Thus

, it significantly helpful to save old skills and ways. In conclusion, due to modern tech innovated by a country, the usual skills and

way

Suggestion

a way

of life expired,

although

, it is useless to store old skills. While I believe that it is necessary to save the traditional way of

work

alive.