Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that developed countries should support developing countries with humanitarian aids when they experience
wrath
Suggestion
the wrath
of nature.
This
essay agrees with
this
statement because poorer nations do not have the capability to overcome
such
events and their governments are
also
to blame. Most of the Poorer countries are incapable to face disasters. Most of them do not have the criteria to counter disasters. Rules and regulations should be settled to avoid any fatal conditions that may occur. Any country that located in areas near to a volcano,
for example
, should maintain the surrounding areas frequently.
For instance
, researchers in a recent study have found that the reason behind thousands of deaths in Thailand when the Tsunami hit their costs was the lack of loud sirens to inform people about the tremendous waves.
Governments
Suggestion
The governments
of poorer countries still play the role of a victim. Despite of having experts and well - known researchers in natural disasters, they are unable to deal with suddenly occurred events due to their government’s failure. Unfortunately, officials
are keep
Suggestion
are keeping
keep
are kept
blaming each other without carrying the responsibility to solve the issue. Amazon forests which consider the lung of earth in Brazil were under the attack of flames a month ago. Almost 30% of the forest was totally destroyed and converted into blackness within a very short period of time. Unfortunately, Brazilian officials started to blame each other
instead
of taking an action until Western countries flew their jets to extinct flames. In conclusion, rich nations should keep supporting poorer countries because of the insufficient efforts of a poor country and their officials can not be able to take care of their countries.
Submitted by zaid.qassem1991 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Humanitarian relief
  • Infrastructure
  • Global solidarity
  • Disproportionately
  • External assistance
  • Rebuilding efforts
  • Disaster response
  • Investment in stability
  • Dependency theory
  • Responsible intervention
  • Paternalistic
  • Shared humanity
  • Sovereignty
  • Capabilities
  • Fatality rates
What to do next:
Look at other essays: