Smacking children is the best form of discpline. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree ?

An age-old practice of beating the

child

for teaching obedience and to instil learning is increasingly popular in some demographies. In my opinion, I completely disagree with

this

notion. Some societies believe that inflicting pain, especially to unruly children, is the only way to ingrain rules and obedience. They think that creating a sense of terror in the young minds about the consequences will highly likely deter them committing misdemeanours.

In other words

, it not only gives them a sense of assurance that the

child

will not go astray but

also

comply with the taught moral standards.

This

suggests that why some parents tend to resort to cruel methods to reinforce good behaviour in youngsters.

On the other hand

, doling out corporal punishments to tame a kid's behaviour is simply preposterous. The consequences of these kinds of sentences are detrimental to the

child

's growth and development. They become stubborn, isolate themselves from the family as they

demonize

make into a demon

demonise

them.

Furthermore

,

this

not only makes

then

objective case of they

them

stubborn but

Accept comma addition

stubborn, but

also

habituate to maltreatments. Sometimes, in extreme cases, desensitized parents often suffer from

loosing

fail to keep or to maintain; cease to have, either physically or in an abstract sense

losing

their

child

.

For instance

, either out of fear of beatings or notwithstanding with the expectations of the guardians, children tend to commit suicide

instead

.

This

explains as to why handing out spanking as a means of teaching is not the best way of addressing curious minds.