The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years, and there are few places which are unaffected by it. However, tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Throughout 50 years, the tourism sector has expanded significantly and there are some places which were suffered because of

this

;

however

, at the same time, tourism has had

apositive

Correct your spelling

a positive

impact on countries, attracting more and more visitors. Personally, I partially agree with

this

statement. Even though the excessive

number

of

tourists

can boost the

economy

of the state, it might

also

cause damage to eye-catching locations and landmarks, which can be tough to recover these places later on. On the one hand, attracting

tourists

can infl uence the

economy

of the country.

This

is because more attractions are needed to enhance and conserve them each year.

That is

to say, if foreign individuals'

number

increases, so the

number

of businesses do.

As a result

, more businesses can pay to the government, like a tax due in the long run. To illustrate, in Turkey, there are about 30 million travellers, who visit every year and attend local restaurants or other local attractions. The higher the

number

of

tourists

, the more income for the government. Despite the influence on the

economy

,

tourists

can harm places by littering. Since all

tourists

are mindfully differentiated, they can either harm or understand the price of the attraction.

For example

, the French parliament estimates per year the amount of garbage, caused by visitors and overwhelmed that it increases with the

number

of

tourists

.

That is

why I think, the

number

of

tourists

can influence on local environment dramatically. In conclusion,

although

it brings impacts on the

economy

,

tourists

might damage the environment, which cannot be recovered in the future.