With increasing population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty? How can this be solved?

The rapid increase in term of people's number leads to a great demand in creating urban

centers

an area that is approximately central within some larger region

centres

on existent

unpopulated

areas

such

as natural

beauty

spots. The human habitat extension has destroyed many green places for a long time. From my perspective, I consider that preservation of natural

beauty

spots can be an escape from

worst effects

Suggestion

the worst effects

generated by pollution. Admittedly, the natural

beauty

has brought enormous benefits

for

Suggestion

to

existent life on the Earth. Obviously, the green environment has defended the excess of dioxide

carbon which

Accept comma addition

carbon, which

is harmful to several creatures. Unfortunately, human activities,

for

example burning

Accept comma addition

example, burning

the fossil fuels, have generated a huge amount of dioxide

carbon

more than ever happened naturally on the Earth.

That is

why, our planet is not capable of recycling immediately

this

gas accumulation. The more destructive plans of natural

beauty

occur in our society, the more

carbon

dioxide will remain in the atmosphere. It is important to keep the

carbon

recycle mechanics in touch with our

existent

Suggestion

existing

population and future generation. The

solution

to

this

issue is related to the human dimension regarding space. A good idea is to concentrate the population in the

existent

Suggestion

existing

urban

centers

an area that is approximately central within some larger region

centres

, offering better services and facilities. To exemplify,

this

solution

means a better space management in private and community ownership. A counter argument is that everyone will be constrained related to how large their household are. Another

solution

is promoting the eco-friendly building standards: underground and tree houses. It ensures that there will not bring any radical modifications on the natural

beauty

spots. The negative aspect is that these houses are not very secure. The underground dwellings are often treated by floods, whereas, the tree-houses by the wind. A

further

solution

consists of colonisation of other planets around the Earth, but it is revolutionary because of the difficulty in creating human comfort in those hostile areas. After boxing of

this

issue, in

this

contemporary world, I consider that advantages of natural

beauty

spots should remain for our future generations. I am convicted that overpopulation will be solved once the time is passed.