Due to the advances in science, it is now possible for people to live 100 old or even longer. While some people think it is a good thing, others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

When discussing whether people should be allowed to live longer,

as a result

of the new developments in science, one should bear in mind the complexity of the issue.

Although

some people think it is a good idea, because it permits people to remain with their loved ones, others believe it is a negative development, due to its vast environmental and social

affects

property of a personal character that is portable but not used in business

effects

. In my opinion, allowing people to live until the age of 100 years or older, will have bad consequences

on

Suggestion

for

our community and should not be permitted. In

this

essay I will give arguments and examples to support my position. One argument in favour of my position, is that the enlargement in human population,

as a result

of the new findings in medical science, will have

devistating

making light of

devastating

consequences

on

Suggestion

for

our planet. Currently, there is a growing need for agriculture and animal farming lands in order to supply the increased food demand. Once people will live over 100 years,

this

demand will increase substantially, leading to more areas

beeing

the state or fact of existing

being

been

diverted for the food industry.

As a result

, natural forests will diminish even more, affecting the air we breath.

This

has been shown in a recent study by Harvard University, that reported a 5% decrease in natural forests in Brazil which were diverted into animal farming areas, and a 3% increase in air pollution over the

last

10 years. Another reason to support my opinion is that older population requires an increased medical care, increasing the burden on our health system and

sociaty

an extended social group having a distinctive cultural and economic organization

society

. As we grow older there are many physical conditions,

such

as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, which require medical attention. Due to the increased population age, the health system needs to direct funding from other sources to deal with the increased demand. As an example, A New York Times article reported that due to the increased incidence of diabetes among the elderly in the

last

5 years, the national health system

canceled

(of events) no longer planned or scheduled

cancelled

a state program to fight obesity among American children. In conclusion, I maintain that we should not be allowed to live over 100 years of age, due to the social and economic

affects

property of a personal character that is portable but not used in business

effects

. We should have a normal life, and save our planet so that our children could have a full and happy life.