Some people think that the governments should give financial support to artists, musicians and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Whether the

government

should provide financial assistance to the country’s artists is an often debated topic. Some people believe that the

government

should help artists; others think that spending money on artists is akin to wasting the nation’s wealth. In

this

essay, we will take a look at both sides of the argument before arriving at a conclusion.

Art

forms are an integral part of the nation’s cultural heritage. Some people believe that by helping artists the

government

can help protect the cultural legacy of the country.

This

argument is true to a certain extent. The advent of films and television has considerably affected the popularity of other

art

forms. It is a known fact that many ethnic

art

forms are now dying because of the lack of support. A little financial assistance is all that it takes to protect these

art

forms from total extinction. Some people,

on the other hand

, argue that spending money on arts and artists is wasteful because there are several other sectors that desperately require

government

funding.

For example

, in many undeveloped and developing

countries millions

Accept comma addition

countries, millions

of people don’t have access to safe drinking water or electricity. Meeting these requirements is far more important than protecting the nation’s

art

forms from extinction. After

analyzing

consider in detail and subject to an analysis in order to discover essential features or meaning

analysing

both sides of the argument, it is felt that

government

assistance to artists is justifiable only in countries that have successfully met all basic requirements of its people. In the case of undeveloped

nations it

Accept comma addition

nations, it

makes better sense to spend public money on other pressing needs of the people.