Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians and poets, etc. However, other people think that is a waste of money.

Many people’s lives are richer because of

art

– music, paintings, calligraphy, pictures, sculpture, poems and dance. There are some who claim that it is important to support the

artists

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and others who are opposed to

government

funding. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both sides of the argument and

finally

give my opinion. There are many reasons why

government

Add an article

the government

show examples

should fund

artists

. The contributions of

artists

to the society are

very

Rephrase

apply

show examples

essential.

Art

can bring out people’s creativity, views and personalities.

For example

, we learn about our history, traditions and culture through movies, songs and paintings made by

artists

.

Artists

are the media of diffusing tradition. All kinds of

tradition

Fix the agreement mistake

traditions

show examples

are the basis of a

country

without which the

country

can’t be civilised. So

artists

are the ambassadors of culture and play a vital role in elevating the level of civilization of the

country

. It is a major form of cultural abundance. Another important aspect of

this

is that

art

is an ancient means of communication. Our language is a result of people’s need to communicate.

Art

is what differentiates us from animals.

Art

is our soul and it is a source of courage.

Artists

also

entertain us.

Finally

,

government

Add an article

the government

show examples

should fund

artists

because earning a livelihood from

art

is difficult

especially

Add the comma(s)

, especially

show examples

in the budding stages. Opponents of

government

funding

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

artists

say that

money

spent on the arts could have been used for considerably more vital purposes. They have strong reasons as a nation’s health and wellbeing should be paramount. The idea that elderly people are forced to wait for essential operations whilst the

money

required to increase available medical provision is spent on opera and ballet is plainly immoral. There are

also

more deserving social causes for the

money

that should be considered before the arts. Homelessness, unemployment, illiteracy – all of these deserve to be addressed before

money

is spent on what is essentially little more than entertainment. To summarise, I would like to say that as both sides have strong arguments, it depends on the condition of the

country

. In developed countries where even the poorest of the poor have all the basic amenities of life,

government

Add an article

the government

show examples

should spend on

art

and

artists

but in countries where people are dying of starvation and diseases, other matters should be given priority.