Some people believe that politicians are more influential than scientists, whilst others believe that scientists have more influence. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is perceived by a group of people that political personnel are more powerful than scientific researchers, whereas another group argues
in contrast
to
this
notion. I believe that scientists have more worth in a
country
in comparison with public servants.
This
essay will discuss both viewpoints with supportive opinion followed by a reasoned conclusion. A developed
country
is known by several
factors one
Accept comma addition
factors, one
of them is its technological advancement.
In addition
, a hi-tech
country
is considered world’s most powerful
country
. The key contributor to its technological progress is its scientists. I agree
to
Suggestion
with
in
the belief that scientists are
more high
Suggestion
higher
-ranking as they solely serve to their
country
.
For instance
, USA being a technologically advanced
country
is able to send its scientists to go to other planets
first
to the moon and now to
mars
a small reddish planet that is the 4th from the sun and is periodically visible to the naked eye; minerals rich in iron cover its surface and are responsible for its characteristic color
Mars
.
Furthermore
, their scientific experiments about
universe
Suggestion
the universe
are introducing many astonishing realities to the whole world.
Although
parliament members play a significant role in policy making of a
country
and they are meant to serve as public
servants but
Accept comma addition
servants, but
unfortunately, most of them fail to do so. I contradict with the opinion that politicians are more powerful than scientists as most of them prefer themselves over the
country
.
For example
, in many developing countries like Pakistan, a number of political members are found guilty in corruption cases that directly affect the economy of the
country
. In the end, the impression that politicians have more influence over scientists is not worthy. I believe that scientists serve more than politicians that has made scientists more influential. It is suggested that public servants must be selected on
merits
Suggestion
the merits
rather than their powerful background.
Submitted by mrym_msd on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: