Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As transportation plays a key role in the development of societies, it has been a matter of many controversies. While many believe that governments should invest more on railroads, others believe that roads are as important. I personally believe that rail systems should be prioritized over roads for the matter of sustainability and cost-effectiveness. Trains are more economical modes of transportations. On the one hand, their maintenance and operational costs are far less the
road
transport,
on the other hand
, they offer cheaper fees for commuters.
Although
railway network, as a luxurious infrastructure
for
Suggestion
in
some developing countries, require larger amounts of
invssestment
the act of investing; laying out money or capital in an enterprise with the expectation of profit
investment
, in the long run, the lower maintenance and operational costs make it a considerably cost-effective choice.
Furthermore
, as trains, LRTs and subways can transport myriads of commuters at one, they offer cheaper and more economical fees for users, making them the
first
choice of many. Railways make a great contribution to enhancing sustainability.
Firstly
, since trains and subways usually work with electricity, they are more sustainable and environmental friendly.
Secondly
, rail transport can carry a large number of commuters that in comparison to
road
vehicles
uses
Suggestion
use
much less energy.
In addition
, it is a proven fact that building more
road
networks
leads
Suggestion
lead
to stimulating the latent demand of
road
vehicles, which is hindered by traffic congestion.
This
means investment in roads leads to an exponential rise in car trips, increasing fossil fuel consumption. In conclusion, I do believe that policymakers should expend more on train systems because they are more sustainable and financially justifiable.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: