Wealthy countries should accept more refuge and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that more refuge ought to be welcomed by the rich countries and facilitate them with basic needs,
such
as sustenance and shelter. I completely disagree with
this
statement because when they come to the receiving
state
they do not own that
country
and they
also
put strain on the health and education system. The main reason why financially strong nations should not accept the refugees is because they do not own that
state
where they come as a refugee. And they create many problems in that
state
,
such
as, they do corruption as well as they become involved in drug supply in the
state
.
For example
, a recent survey conducted by the Forest university in Canada that the people who are involved in drugs dealing are the ones who came from different parts of the world to Canada as a refugee. The
second
main reason is that they want to be treated like nationals. They put a strain on the health and education system of that
state
who accepts them. They want jobs in public sectors and when do not get the jobs they curse the nation.
For instance
, there is a report of The New York Times that people who came from different parts of the world are demanding jobs in public sectors in Chicago.
However
, some refugees are capable enough of doing their own business and give the financial benefit to that
country
where they came as a refugee. In conclusion,
although
some refugees give benefits to the nation, I believe wealthier countries should not welcome the refugees because do not think that
country
as their own
country
.
Submitted by saifuddin.abdulrehman on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Humanitarian obligation
  • Financial resources
  • Infrastructure
  • Labor shortages
  • Essential services
  • International human rights conventions
  • Social cohesion
  • Cultural diversity
  • Public services
  • Inclusive practices
What to do next:
Look at other essays: