Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Some people suggest that the circumstances of a crime, and the reasons for committing it should be taken into consideration when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sentencing for those found guilty of crimes presents a difficult challenge because justice must be seen to be done for both victims and perpetrators. Mandatory sentencing ensures that the same sentence is handed out for the same crime;
however
, judges lose the ability to adjust sentences and cannot take into account factors
such
as age and the possibility of rehabilitation. In
this
essay, the consequences of mandatory sentencing will be discussed. Mandatory sentencing has the advantage that everyone is aware of exactly the sentence they can expect if found guilty of a particular crime.
Nonetheless
, since people who commit crimes are often poorly educated and may not consider the consequences of their actions when they commit a legal misconduct,
this
approach may offer little benefit.Removing the ability of judges to adjust sentences on the basis of the circumstances of a crime may
also
lead to injustice as it assumes that any two people who commit the same violation have the same level of moral culpability.
For example
, someone who murders in order to prevent suffering is morally different to someone who murders a stranger at random. Applying the same sentences in
such
disparate cases clearly would not serve the interests of either justice or the wider community.
In addition
, it may be appropriate to give a young person who has committed a wrongdoing a lighter sentence in order to give them the opportunity to change their behaviour and become a productive and law-abiding citizen.
In contrast
, a person who is older and has committed many crimes should receive a heavier penalty as they are more likely to offend again in the future and heavier sentences are needed to protect the community. In summary, mandatory sentencing may lead to injustice because the same misconduct may be committed for very different reasons.
In addition
, a person’s history and the opportunity for rehabilitation should
also
be taken into consideration when deciding sentences for those convicted of committing crimes.
Submitted by vishalsagarbhandary on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: