Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and violent crimes increases. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the past few decades, there has been controversy over the issue of capital

punishment

, where people may think that it is crucial to execute

this

for the purpose of deterring, but others do not. In my opinion, I advocate that the

death

penalty

is essential to maintaining the rules of society. To start with, people may think that the

death

penalty

is necessary to reduce the violence of the crimes. A good instance of

this

is that people attacked by strangers accidently in a couple of years ago in Taiwan and in the United States,

such

as shooting or stabbing. In order to help people stem public panic and to deter the criminals, people deem that it is the most effective way to address the issue by introducing the

death

penalty

. As my personal opinion, I agree with

this

idea of capital

punishment

because it could reduce crime rates and maintain the rules of society.

However

,

although

some people are opposed to using capital

punishment

with decreasing offences repeatedly, the reason for

this

is that the

death

penalty

could not eliminate the root causes of problems and would deliver the wrong message for citizens with violent behaviour.

In other words

, it seems like a form of revenge by enforcing the

death

penalty

and there is no any reason to allow people to deprive the rights of human beings.

On the other hand

, I still believe that preserving the

death

penalty

is reminding people with the strict law and

also

think that abolishing it would not solve the criminal behaviour. In conclusion, capital

punishment

is a debatable issue and have strong views on both sides. Taking prompt actions can be declined the violent crimes.