libraries should be replaced by computers discuss pros cons and your opinion

Libraries have always been the primary source of education or recreation s

ince

Suggestion

for

many years. Modernisation has invaded and computers are leading the charge.

However

, libraries have a strong guard and should never be replaced by computers. Let’s take a look at both sides of the coin.

Firstly

, the major benefit of digitisation is the ubiquity of access everywhere. All the traditional material along with the new one is available at your fingertips. The ease of utilisation makes modernisation extremely resourceful.

Secondly

, the data and the books can be copied without any error and since it’s on a d

evice there

Accept comma addition

device, there

is no need of dependence on a permanent object keeping a guard on the same.

Also

, the storage is vast and permits expansion to include various literatures, old or new, classified at ease.

However

, when the traditional errors are reduced, contemporary threats arise. Identity theft, wherein the copyright holder might lose its control over some miscreants on the dark web. Funding for digitising the plethora of available literature is a serious question as well. Another issue is the physical deterioration with the technological obsolescence. Health problems are collateral damage. Lethargy, the sedentary lifestyle

moreover

, the eye strain and the resulting neurological issues a

re

introduces an alternative

or

concerns which need to be addressed. To brief I’d say, despite of the easy access, easier preservation or unlimited storage benefits, traditional libraries with the equivocal charm of the new books and e

nigmatic smell

Suggestion

the enigmatic smell

of the good old paperbacks still hold the charm. Replacing them, is nearly impossible.