Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 22 minutes passed, 10;39

Investment from authority is considered as an essential marker for any kind of development in a country, but whether the
fund
should be allocated in cultural branch or service sector, is a matter of discussion. I believe that investing money on both sides is essential.
To begin
, allocating sanction on arts brings some benefits.
First
, it aids to develop culturally-minded people.
As a result
, they stand their nation in any cultural exhibition and participate in different competitions so that the country becomes focused to other nations that helps to bring more development aids.
Second
,
government
sanction fosters moral character of the public because they are free from any kind of complexity.
For example
, arts sector usually teaches regarding music and theatre that talk about the heart, it does not discuss about profit, loss, money.
Thus
, allocation
fund
on culture is advantageous.
However
, on the other side, investing money on public services have enormous advantages.
First
of all, it develops physically strong nation by curing any type of diseases.
For instance
, local authority should distribute more
fund
in different hospitals and primary health centres so that patients could get proper treatment on expending little charge. Therefor, people become cure from any kind of diseases.
In addition
, the authority, aided the
fund
on education helps to become literate. Say for, if the
government
will allocate a significant amount of aid to higher education, the students become more interest for higher study.
Hence
, they will spend much time on education. So investing aid on the service is benefited. To conclude, anyone could raise a voice on
government
funding, whether it will be allocated for culture or service sector, but I think
government
aid should be on both sides equal.
Submitted by iqbal.unigroup on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: