In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby. To what extend do you think is a positive trand?

During the time, shopping suffered an evolution: in the past, it was seen as a necessary needs, while nowadays, many people do to to relax or as a hobby. I believe that

this

concept isn't a positive trend for a lot of reasons.

Firstly

, there is an economic issue,

for example

, someone couldn't spend much money,

in other words

,

this

creates two social classes: riches and poors.

Secondly

, in your free time, you would go to a shopping centre

instead

of tiny and local market,

therefore

the money earned by common people drops drastically. Another trouble could be due to buying too much products without a real need,

thus

it soars the price of primary goods. In contrary, many consumers think how

this

situation is a wonderful way to do shopping. They analyse the lack of alienation caused by routine.

Moreover

, they hang out with their friends, improving their social activities, while they make a necessary task.

Last

but not least, they have observed who has a hobby away from home,

as a result

the risk of health problems plummets sharply because

this

type of person generates hormones linked to physical well-being.

However

, summing up, shopping can't be considered a hobby, only an interesting activity: behind the concept of buying products, there is a responsibility sense, likely boring, where a person manages his money to his family. To conclude, the personal welfare is caused by doing something funny, it could be shopping or other amusement, so it is better practising sports.