The best way to deal with the rising problem of traffic and transportation is by encouraging people to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Traffic
jams have become an increasingly acute
problem
for certain geographical areas. Some people claim that the most effective method to combat the
problem
is to encourage individuals to move to cities from suburbs and countrysides.
This
essay will argue reasons as to why urbanization is not the best way to go about, even though there are some benefits to it. Settling down in cities of residents of countrysides will significantly decrease the number of personal transport on the roads.
That is
because people who had to commute big distances in order to get to their workplaces will no longer have to do that. Living in a big city gives the opportunity to find a job of interest nearby person’s home.
This
makes taking a short walk to work rather than using transport possible, which leads to a smaller number of drivers on highways.
This
instance has bolstered existing opinion that moving to cities will solve the
problem
of transportation and
traffic
. Despite possible benefits associated with urbanization, the idea that
this
is the best way to solve challenges related to
traffic
is completely preposterous. Resettlement of people could lead to increased amounts of citizens, which, in turn, anyway will increase
traffic
on the roads.
In addition
, the number of people who do not own personal transport might grow and the government will have to take care of
this
as well. Overall, the idea that mass relocation to urban areas will solve transportation and
traffic
problems is ill-informed and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome.
This
essay argued that urbanization is not the best way to solve the
problem
. In my opinion, significant drawbacks of mass moving from rural to urban areas do not allow
this
method to be called the best.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban sprawl
  • public transport infrastructure
  • commutes
  • residential density
  • ecological footprint
  • overcrowding
  • urban planning
  • car-sharing
  • traffic management
  • rural preservation
  • transportation policies
  • electric vehicles
  • sustainable living
  • incentivize
  • telecommuting
What to do next:
Look at other essays: